Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 198-205, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-149988

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify the factors affecting the surgical decisions of experienced physicians when treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms that are suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). METHODS: Patients with LUTS/BPH treated by two physicians between October 2004 and August 2013 were included in this study. The causal Bayesian network (CBN) model was used to analyze factors influencing the surgical decisions of physicians and the actual performance of surgery. The accuracies of the established CBN models were verified using linear regression (LR) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,108 patients with LUTS/BPH were analyzed. The mean age and total prostate volume (TPV) were 66.2 (+/-7.3, standard deviation) years and 47.3 (+/-25.4) mL, respectively. Of the total 1,108 patients, 603 (54.4%) were treated by physician A and 505 (45.6%) were treated by physician B. Although surgery was recommended to 699 patients (63.1%), 589 (53.2%) actually underwent surgery. Our CBN model showed that the TPV (R=0.432), treating physician (R=0.370), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) on urodynamic study (UDS) (R=0.324), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) question 3 (intermittency; R=0.141) were the factors directly influencing the surgical decision. The transition zone volume (R=0.396), treating physician (R=0.340), and BOO (R=0.300) directly affected the performance of surgery. Compared to the LR model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CBN surgical decision model was slightly compromised (0.803 vs. 0.847, P<0.001), whereas that of the actual performance of surgery model was similar (0.801 vs. 0.820, P=0.063) to the LR model. CONCLUSIONS: The TPV, treating physician, BOO on UDS, and the IPSS item of intermittency were factors that directly influenced decision-making in physicians treating patients with LUTS/BPH.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bayes Theorem , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Decision Support Techniques , Linear Models , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prostate , Prostatic Hyperplasia , ROC Curve , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction , Urodynamics
2.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 47-51, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-7831

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the perioperative changes in bladder wall thickness and detrusor wall thickness after transurethral prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one men who were treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms with transurethral prostatectomy were prospectively analyzed from May 2012 to July 2013. Prostate size, detrusor wall thickness, and bladder wall thickness were assessed by transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography perioperatively. All postoperative evaluations were performed 1 month after the surgery. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 69.0 years, the mean prostate-specific antigen concentration was 8.1 ng/mL, and the mean prostate volume was 63.2 mL. The mean bladder wall thickness was 5.1 mm (standard deviation [SD], +/-1.6), 5.1 mm (SD, +/-1.6), and 5.0 mm (SD, +/-1.4) preoperatively and 4.5 mm (SD, +/-1.5), 4.5 mm (SD, +/-1.3), and 4.6 mm (SD, +/-1.2) postoperatively in the anterior wall, dome, and trigone, respectively (p=0.178, p=0.086, and p=0.339, respectively). The mean detrusor wall thickness was 0.9 mm (SD, +/-0.4) preoperatively and 0.7 mm (SD, +/-0.3) postoperatively (p=0.001). A subgroup analysis stratifying patients into a large prostate group (weight, > or =45 g) and a high Abrams-Griffiths number group (>30) showed a significant decrease in detrusor wall thickness (p=0.002, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: There was a decrease in detrusor wall thickness after transurethral prostatectomy. The large prostate group and the high Abrams-Griffiths number group showed a significant decrease in detrusor wall thickness after surgery.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prospective Studies , Prostate , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Ultrasonography , Urinary Bladder , Urinary Tract
3.
International Neurourology Journal ; : 29-34, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-173927

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to report the experience acquired at the Seoul National University Hospital with Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP), combined with mechanical morcellation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the clinical data of 309 consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution between July 2008 and June 2010. All patients were evaluated preoperatively for prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) score. Peri- and postoperative parameters were evaluated and patients were followed-up at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- months with the aforementioned investigations. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 68.3 (+/-6.5) years and mean prostate volume was 55.6 (+/-23.6) mL. Mean enucleation time was 56.2 (+/-25.1) minutes, mean morcellation time was 11.3 (+/-9.5) minutes, and the mean resected weight of the prostate was 20.8 (+/-16.9) g. The mean catheter indwelling period was 1.9 (+/-1.7) days and mean hospital stay was 2.9 (+/-1.5) days. Significant improvement was noted in Qmax, IPSS, and QoL at the 1-year follow-up compared with baseline (P<0.01). At 1 month 17.2% of patients complained of irritative urinary symptoms, which were typically self-limiting within 3 months. Transient stress incontinence was reported in 15.2% of patients. No patient experienced persistent obstructive symptoms that required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that HoLEP is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for BPH.


Subject(s)
Humans , Catheters , Follow-Up Studies , Holmium , Lasers, Solid-State , Length of Stay , Prostate , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL